Obama extends sanctions on Zimbabwe?

President Barack Obama has extended sanctions of then in 1994 former soldiers of the Zanu PF began the process of evicting White farmers from their homes and farms.Mugabe tried to stop it,but the winds were blowing in a different direction.Mugabe risked a civil war if he tried to stop the land seizures,so he decided in supporting land reform.The Whites were shocked and their sense of invincibility was gone.This was right around the time Namibia because independent and Mandela was becoming South Africa's president,denying the White racist in Zimbabwe allies in the region.

With the loss of South Africa,Botswana,Angola.Mozambique,Namibia,the White's dream of a Southern African homeland something like Australia came to an end.The British and French now operate through surrogates and proxy in the region.One of the ways is to discredit leaders of African nations.Angolan President Eduordo Dos Santos is facing the same unbalanced criticism.But note the very corrupt presidents of Cameroon,and EQ Guinea get almost no negative coverage in the Western media,if they are mentioned at all.Can you guest why?An African leader is bad when they are not serving the interest of White nations.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uvUJKXBRt8g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

You need to be a member of Black Afrikan Infrastructure Organization Social Network to add comments!

Join Black Afrikan Infrastructure Organization Social Network

Comments

  • I never fully trusted Robert Mugabe! Why the hell would you fight for your country successfully in 1980 and leave the  white squatters/invaders on your land? That was utter foolishness! I have always wondered if this was why Joshua Nkomo and Mugabe split later on?

    I believe that this split occurred because Joshua Nkomo rightly wanted to evict the European squatters out of our land!

  • Thank you brother Emile

  • BTW:...Outstanding, 5-Star rated BAIO Show yesterday (The Rise & Fall of Black Churches), as well as the insightful & very encouraging contributions by Mr. Rosenthall!!!

  • 3522395?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024

    It's funny that you should bring up this particular subject in a timely manner.

    I recently finished reading the book "Confessions of An Economic Hit Man" by John Perkins. The book summarizes nearly all of the unparalleled damage left to various "Third World" economies and respective geopolitical environments through systemic corporatocracy as practiced by the West. We can't be certain that the same intentions are being planned for Sub-Saharan Afrikan nations, although current business news would suggest otherwise. But at least we have a heads-up on what the possibilities are should they become relevant in the future.

    If you look at the current status of not only Sub-Saharan Afrikan nations but also those across the globe, the economic and political uncertainties that exist can be partially explained through the commercial, diplomatic, economic, and political plans that were executed over 30-50 years ago. Stagnant economic growth, divisive politics, and sheer anxiety faced by tens of millions of unemployed/underemployed individuals are clear signs of failed leadership. Within two generations, the game has been rigged to allow the the rich to continue getting richer and the poor poorer across all demographics in today's world. Huge imbalances in trade, healthcare, quality-of-life rankings, land control & management, and wealth distribution based on equity are some of the key indicators of what should not be repeated for future generations.

    Placing or extending sanctions against a particular country, or any country for that matter, will not improve the lives of either the imposing nation, nor the nation that receives such unwarranted restrictions upon its true and honorable potential for self-governance, self-improvement and sovereignty. The opportunity for improving relations of any kind between both nations is to seek out what works best for each nation's best interests, as well as the due respect for sovereignty.

    Just as one cannot envision Zimbabweans righteously imposing themselves (and their interests) upon the rights of British and American landowners, farmers, key industries, etc., you also cannot expect President Mugabe to allow his country in its entirety to become disadvantageous, economically inefficient, and lacking competitive advantages with its natural resources. 

    We need a new way of improving relations between nations across the globe, especially one that allows each to improve the most dire domestic issues in their own way without the interference of others. If each nation respected and honored the sovereignty of others, this would allow the investment and management of more time, energy and resources toward the pressing problems that need fixing in our own backyard. 

This reply was deleted.